Rep. Lawler Introduces the Professional Student Degree Act

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) introduced the Professional Student Degree Act in the House yesterday. The legislation defines what constitutes a professional degree program, and adds to a list of examples of such programs, including “nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, ministry, social work, audiology, physician assistant, public health, business administration and management, accounting, architecture, secondary education, and special education.”

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBA) set higher loan caps for professional students, and Department of Education negotiated rulemaking reached consensus on a narrow definition of professional students which excludes most allied health programs.

A press release from Rep. Lawler is available here. The bill text is available here.

Inside Higher Ed: Grad Programs Brace for Loan Caps

Most of the colleges with the largest graduate programs in the country don’t have clear plans for how they’ll deal with new loan caps, set to kick in next July. And if they do, they aren’t taking publicly about it.

For years, students could borrow essentially unlimited funds to pay for graduate education, thanks to a program known as Grad PLUS that capped loans at the cost of attendance. Republicans in Congress and other critics have argued that colleges took advantage of this program and raised their prices, fueling the student debt crisis. Loans for grad students make up nearly half of the federal loan portfolio.

Along the way, colleges have begun to rely on graduate education to fund their university operations, higher ed experts say.

Read the full article on Inside Higher Ed here.

ASAHP Urges the Department of Education to Modify the Definition of Professional Degrees

 In response to the Department of Education’s (ED) recent interpretation of which academic programs qualify as ‘professional’ versus ‘graduate’ degrees,

The Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions (ASAHP) is deeply concerned ED’s recent narrowing of programs that qualify as ‘professional’ degrees excludes health professions education.

 In early November, ED launched the first phase of its regulatory process for the student financial aid provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), restricting the professions that qualify as ‘professional’ degrees. Unfortunately, ED's proposal leaves out essential health professions, including allied health, nursing, and public health, from the category of ‘professional’ degrees—ignoring decades of precedent affirming these fields as professional programs.

 Under this new classification, students in health professions and public-service programs will lose access to higher federal loan limits, forcing many to rely on the lower cap—or private loans—despite often substantial tuition costs. While some students may turn to private lenders for additional support once federal aid limits are reached, not all will qualify, and those who do may face higher interest rates. This creates a financial disincentive for students to enter the health professions exactly at the time when we will need them the most.

 Limiting financial access to graduate-level health professions education will lead to lower enrollment, fewer trained professionals, worsening health workforce shortages, and diminished access to care.

 Moreover, amid existing shortages in key health-care sectors—such as allied health, nursing, and public health—reducing financial support could make these essential professions even harder to staff, further limiting access to care, particularly in underserved communities.

The demand for health professions education in the United States is enormous. Our population is aging rapidly: by 2040, roughly one in five Americans will be 65 or older, up from one in eight in 2000. The number of adults aged 65 and over is projected to rise from 58 million in 2022 to 82 million by 2050. As a result, health professionals will be essential to care for our aging society and represent some of the fastest-growing occupations in the economy. In fact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, projects that more than half of the twenty fastest-growing professions over the next decade will be in the health sector.

John Colbert, Executive Director for ASAHP, said, “This severe restriction in ED’s current definition of which professions qualify as “professional” degrees will have far-reaching consequences on health professions. At a time when health needs are growing, the Department of Education risks undermining workforce capacity across allied health, nursing, public health, and other non-physician professions. We strongly urge the Department to revise its definition and recognize the full scope of health professions. Doing so is critical for the health and well-being of our nation.”

Added Jon Williamson, President of ASAHP, “I’ve heard concerns from many of our member institutions about this issue. Considering that up to 60% of the U.S. healthcare workforce falls under ‘health professions,’ it’s hard to imagine a stronger argument for why these programs should be classified alongside the other qualifying healthcare related professional degree programs.” 

To date ASAHP has joined with a coalition of Healthcare Providers and Health Professions Programs seeking to ensure health professions are included as professional degrees as the regulatory process moves forward. In addition, ASAHP has signed on to letters to the Department of Education as well as Congressional Leadership advocating for this important change. We will continue to keep our membership informed of the latest developments.

Rep. Timothy M. Kennedy Introduces the Loan Equity for Advanced Professionals (LEAP) Act

On Wednesday, Rep. Timothy M. Kennedy (D-NY) introduced the Loan Equity for Advanced Professionals (LEAP) Act. The bill ensures graduate students, as defined by the Department, have access to $50,000 annually and $200,000 aggregately and thus the same limits as professional students. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBA) set higher loan caps for professional students, and Department of Education negotiated rulemaking reached consensus on a narrow definition of professional students which excludes most allied health programs. ASAHP supports the LEAP Act.

A press release from Rep. Kennedy is available here [updated to include the December 17 press release].

Also, Rep. Kennedy led 69 of his colleagues in a letter to the Department of Education regarding the Department’s negotiated rulemaking.

The LEAP Act is available here.

Inside Higher Ed: How the Loan Cap Committee Reached Consensus

The Department of Education and its rule-making committee tasked with determining how to implement Congress’s latest loan caps reached consensus Thursday, but that doesn’t mean everyone involved was happy with the results—or that the policy proposal is guaranteed to be legally sound, some higher education experts say.

The key focus of the regulations, which should be published to the Federal Register by early next year, was to determine which degree programs should be eligible for which level of loans.

Read the full article here.

Department of Education Negotiated Rulemaking for Higher Education Reaches Consensus

This week the Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) Committee concluded its negotiated rulemaking session to address changes to the Higher Education Act included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, reaching consensus on the entire package of 17 proposals by the Department of Education.

The OBBBA set new student loan caps for graduate students, with a higher cap for those pursuing a professional degree. Graduate students would be limited to an up to $100,000 lifetime cap while professional students would be limited to an up to $200,000 lifetime cap. Significant time was spent on ED’s proposal regarding the definition of what constitutes a professional degree. Ultimately, consensus was reached on a list of professional programs that was significantly less expansive than a proposal put forward by Alex Holt, the committee member representing taxpayers and the public interest, which would have included more health professions programs. Holt’s proposal appeared to gain support from all committee members except the Department of Education. Ultimately, negotiators felt reaching consensus was best in order to lock in other concessions they had won from the Department, as without consensus the Department would be free to write its own proposal to be released for public comment.

ASAHP and other organizations called for the Department of Education to classify all professions under CIP Code 51 — Health Professions and Related Clinical Sciences, and related codes as “professional degrees”, though the committee agreed to a narrower definition. In a letter to the Department and RISE Committee members, ASAHP and other organizations expressed how excluding programs within CIP Code 51 would fragment financial aid eligibility, exacerbate existing shortages, limit access to education for students seeking to serve in critical health roles, and undermine the interprofessional foundation.

Coverage from Inside Higher Ed may be accessed here.

ASAHP Joins Letter to the Department of Education Negotiated Rulemaking Committee on Student Loan Caps

ASAHP was one of 28 organizations which joined a letter to the Department of Education’s Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) Committee as it continues its work in Session 2 of negotiated rulemaking to implement the student financial aid provisions of Public Law 119–21, commonly referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The OBBBA set new student loan caps for graduate students, with a higher cap for those pursuing a professional degree. ASAHP and the organizations recommend that the Department:

1. Classify all professions under CIP Code 51 — Health Professions and Related Clinical Sciences, and related codes as “professional degrees.”

2. Define “professional degree” as any degree leading to a professional credential required for entry into practice in that field.

3. Define “professional degree” based on accreditation, curriculum, and alignment with recognized health profession standards, not program length or credit hours. 

4. Recognize the critical workforce impact of any exclusion of health professions degrees, which would disproportionately harm communities in rural and underserved areas.

The letter may be accessed here.

Department of Education Negotiated Rulemaking for Higher Education

The Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) Committee will hold its second session November 3-7 from 9am to noon Eastern and 1pm to 4pm Eastern. The committee’s first session was held September 29-October 3. The five-day in person negotiated rulemaking session will address changes to the Higher Education Act included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. These include the phase out of graduate and professional PLUS loans, the establishment of new annual loan limits for graduate and professional students and parent borrowers, the simplification of student loan repayment plans, institutional flexibility to apply lower annual limits for borrowers for selected programs of study, modifications to loan rehabilitation, and more. More details may be accessed here.  Registration for the session is here.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act set new student loan caps for graduate students, with a higher cap for those pursuing a professional degree. ASAHP and other organizations has reccommended that the Department:

1. Classify all professions under CIP Code 51 — Health Professions and Related Clinical Sciences, and related codes as “professional degrees.”

2. Define “professional degree” as any degree leading to a professional credential required for entry into practice in that field.

3. Define “professional degree” based on accreditation, curriculum, and alignment with recognized health profession standards, not program length or credit hours. 

4. Recognize the critical workforce impact of any exclusion of health professions degrees, which would disproportionately harm communities in rural and underserved areas.

ASAHP Joins Joint Letter to the Department of Education Regarding Student Loan Repayment

ASAHP joined other organizations in a letter to the Department of Education expressing concern that that the regulatory framework for loan repayment programs under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) may not adequately reflect the realities of the health professions workforce. The organizations urge the Department to ensure that the health professions workforce is considered a single, integrated workforce when determining loan eligibility criteria. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act set new student loan caps for graduate students, with a higher cap for those pursuing a professional degree.

The letter may be accessed here.

ASAHP Joins ACE Letter to Congressional Leadership on Funding Safeguards

ASAHP joined dozens of other organizations in a ACE-led letter to Congressional leadership and appropriators regarding appropriations safeguards, as Congress considers FY 26 funding. The letter urges Congress to ensure that all funds allocated for FY 2026 be spent by the administration as intended, which may require detailed legislative language and other procedural safeguards.

The letter may be accessed here.

ASAHP Awards 2025 Excellence in Interprofessional Collaboration to Saint Louis University

The Interprofessional Committee of the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions (ASAHP) is pleased to announce that Saint Louis University is the recipient of the 2025 Award for Institutional Excellence and Innovation in Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Health Care. The University will be recognized and present their award-winning program in October at the 2025 ASAHP Annual Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana.

New America Webinar on How Indirect Cost Reform Will Affect University-Industry R&D Partnerships

On September 22 from 2:30-3:30pm Eastern, New America will hold a webinar titled, “ How Indirect Cost Reform Will Affect University-Industry R&D Partnerships”. The webinar will examine the concern about indirect costs and the Financial Accountability in Research (FAIR) model, a proposed approach to reform indirect cost governance and improve transparency, consistency, and fairness in calculating and covering expenses.

More details may be accessed here.

House Subcommittee Advances HRSA Title VII Reauthorization Legislation

On Wednesday, the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health advanced reauthorizations of HRSA Title VII and Title VIII workforce development programs. In the bill, Title VII health professions education workforce development programs would be reauthorized through FY 2030.

More details are here, and the Subcommittee’s Title VII bill is here.

House Committee Advances FY 26 Labor-HHS Funding Bill

In a mark up which concluded early Wednesday morning, the House Appropriations Committee advanced the FY 26 Labor-HHS bill 35-28 in a party-line vote. According to Republicans, the draft fiscal spending bill proposes a 7% cut in discretionary spending below the FY25 enacted level, while Democrats note it is a 11% cut. The bill includes $108 billion for HHS, a roughly $7 billion cut from FY 25 levels., and includes $67 billion for the Department of Education, a roughly $12 billion cut from FY 25 levels. Democrats strongly opposed the bill. Subcommittee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT-03) remarked that Republicans know this bill will not pass on the floor due to the size and scope of the proposed cuts. In opening remarks, Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD-05) shared, “This bill, whatever we do, will be largely dictated by what the Senate can do.” Subcommittee Chairman Robert Aderholt (R-AL-04) noted, “With the President’s leadership, we have taken a critical look at every program and in several cases had to make hard decisions on some ‘nice to have’ programs.” More details may be accessed here, here, and here.

House Appropriations Subcommittee to Mark Up FY 26 Labor-HHS Bill

Today at 5pm Eastern, the House Appropriation Committee’s Labor-HHS Subcommittee will mark up the FY 26 Labor-HHS appropriations bill.

According to the Committee, the Labor-HHS bill provides, “a total discretionary allocation of $184.5 billion, which is $13.7 billion (7%) below the Fiscal Year 2025 enacted level.” The bill provides a discretionary total of $108 billion to the Department of Health and Human Services, which is $7 billion (6%) below the FY25 enacted level. The Committee would provide a total of $7.1 billion for HRSA, a decrease of $866 million below the FY 2025 level. This recommendation would include $1.4 billion for Health Workforce training, a decrease of $37 million below the FY 2025 level. The bill would provide a total of $7.1 billion for HRSA, $866 million below the FY 2025 level. The bill would provide $1.4 billion for Health Workforce training, a decrease of $37 million below the FY 2025 level.

The bill provides a discretionary total of $67 billion to the Department of Education, which is $12 billion (15%) below the FY25 enacted level. The bill maintains funding for Pell Grants at the discretionary maximum award level of $6,335, which when combined with mandatory funding under current law would continue to support a total maximum award of $7,395, which is level funding.

A Full Committee markup is expected as soon as next week.

The Subcommittee markup may be viewed here. The bill and Republican Committee summary may be found here. Bill summaries from the Committee Democrats may be found here and here.

House Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on Examining Opportunities to Advance American Health Care through the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technologies

On Wednesday, September 3, 2025, at 10:15 am Eastern, the House Energy &. Commerce’s Subcommittee on Health, Chaired by Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) will hold a hearing entitled “Examining Opportunities to Advance American Health Care through the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies.”

A hearing memo from the Subcommittee may be accessed here. The hearing may be viewed here.