This week the Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) Committee concluded its negotiated rulemaking session to address changes to the Higher Education Act included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, reaching consensus on the entire package of 17 proposals by the Department of Education.
The OBBBA set new student loan caps for graduate students, with a higher cap for those pursuing a professional degree. Graduate students would be limited to an up to $100,000 lifetime cap while professional students would be limited to an up to $200,000 lifetime cap. Significant time was spent on ED’s proposal regarding the definition of what constitutes a professional degree. Ultimately, consensus was reached on a list of professional programs that was significantly less expansive than a proposal put forward by Alex Holt, the committee member representing taxpayers and the public interest, which would have included more health professions programs. Holt’s proposal appeared to gain support from all committee members except the Department of Education. Ultimately, negotiators felt reaching consensus was best in order to lock in other concessions they had won from the Department, as without consensus the Department would be free to write its own proposal to be released for public comment.
ASAHP and other organizations called for the Department of Education to classify all professions under CIP Code 51 — Health Professions and Related Clinical Sciences, and related codes as “professional degrees”, though the committee agreed to a narrower definition. In a letter to the Department and RISE Committee members, ASAHP and other organizations expressed how excluding programs within CIP Code 51 would fragment financial aid eligibility, exacerbate existing shortages, limit access to education for students seeking to serve in critical health roles, and undermine the interprofessional foundation.
Coverage from Inside Higher Ed may be accessed here.
